Tecnosinos investirá R$ 15,5 milhões para ampliar em 50% a área construída de 26 mil m2

Calvin Tucker, not surprisingly, you kept to the point in anvnacidg the argument. Thank you, for that.Your logic, however, is that AB\'s portion of his statement Re advocating for violence can be equated to recommend and urge violence which in turn is a call for it, and that is at fault. Firstly, the second portion of AB\'s statement already specifies what he meant in his use of the word advocate. There is no reason to be translating based on someone else\'s definition, when the author, himself, is explaining his use of the word advocate : he admits to advocation for violence as it pertains to it being, in his view, the only solution left for dealing with Chavez. The semantic issue here is that the definition of calling for has a commonality with advocating for , but they are not interchangeable. One can argue that the only solution left is violence without urging for it, much as one can urge for it without much argument. Both are forms of advocacy but only one is a form of calling fo

It only applies to the LL case, aolhtugh I have not read the text of the sentence, several twitter sources have confimed that the judges decided to rule in this specific case, and the decision is not binding to other inhabilitado cases.